<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response to chapters 1 &amp; 2 of Marshall McLuhan&#8217;s Understanding Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leesean.net/2008/10/25/response-to-chapters-1-2-of-marshall-mcluhans-understanding-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leesean.net/2008/10/25/response-to-chapters-1-2-of-marshall-mcluhans-understanding-media/</link>
	<description>The Life of an Artist-Activist-Musician-Nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leesean</title>
		<link>http://leesean.net/2008/10/25/response-to-chapters-1-2-of-marshall-mcluhans-understanding-media/comment-page-1/#comment-71906</link>
		<dc:creator>leesean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leesean.net/?p=1241#comment-71906</guid>
		<description>McLuhan also didn&#039;t have the Internet or video games when he was writing, so his understanding of interactivity is different from what we have today.  Perhaps a better way to describe &quot;hot&quot; and &quot;cold&quot; is the level of participation needed by the viewer/user.  This encompasses both the level of interactivity of a given medium and how much a viewer/listener has to &quot;fill in the blanks&quot; to understand the message.  That is what I meant by &quot;high def/low def.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McLuhan also didn&#8217;t have the Internet or video games when he was writing, so his understanding of interactivity is different from what we have today.  Perhaps a better way to describe &#8220;hot&#8221; and &#8220;cold&#8221; is the level of participation needed by the viewer/user.  This encompasses both the level of interactivity of a given medium and how much a viewer/listener has to &#8220;fill in the blanks&#8221; to understand the message.  That is what I meant by &#8220;high def/low def.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://leesean.net/2008/10/25/response-to-chapters-1-2-of-marshall-mcluhans-understanding-media/comment-page-1/#comment-71902</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leesean.net/?p=1241#comment-71902</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, you got it wrong. McLuhan&#039;s paradigm was the level of interactivity of a means of communication. TV, Movies, Radio were &quot;cold&quot; because there was no interactivity, information moved in one direction only. Telephone was hot because it allowed 2-way (or in the case of party lines) multi-way communication. Interactivity was his key. Thus &quot;the medium was the message&quot; meant that the broadcaster&#039;s message was to be paid attention to because control of the medium gave power and control. Remember, McLuhan did not have Hi-Def TV or the internet when he wrote his thoughts down to be published, these did not exist even in theory!
Please re-read (and FINISH) his book before you comment.
Remember the old saying: one&#039;s level of intelligence is unknown until one opens one&#039;s mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, you got it wrong. McLuhan&#8217;s paradigm was the level of interactivity of a means of communication. TV, Movies, Radio were &#8220;cold&#8221; because there was no interactivity, information moved in one direction only. Telephone was hot because it allowed 2-way (or in the case of party lines) multi-way communication. Interactivity was his key. Thus &#8220;the medium was the message&#8221; meant that the broadcaster&#8217;s message was to be paid attention to because control of the medium gave power and control. Remember, McLuhan did not have Hi-Def TV or the internet when he wrote his thoughts down to be published, these did not exist even in theory!<br />
Please re-read (and FINISH) his book before you comment.<br />
Remember the old saying: one&#8217;s level of intelligence is unknown until one opens one&#8217;s mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

